CSI – IMPOSSIBLE TO ESCAPE February 11, 2008
Posted by arun in TV shows, biology, chemistry, entertainment, math, physics, science, technology.Tags: crime, crime scene investigation, CSI, DNA, drama, evidence, finger print, gil grissom, investigation, las vegas, mac taylor, new york, scene, suspect, technology, thriller, tv-show
5 comments
CSI, Crime Scene Investigation, as many of you might already know, is one of the best featured TV-shows
of its genre, Crime/Drama/Thriller. It comes in three flavors, CSI – Las Vegas, New York and Miami. I have seen only a couple of episodes in Miami, up-to-date on Las Vegas and catching up on New York. Las Vegas was the first and arguably the best, this bias may be because I saw it first. Usually the show consists of a team of 5-6 CSIs. The distinction that sets this show apart is its uniqueness in handling crime scenes by relying only on evidence. Gil Grissom, the head in Las Vegas and Mac Taylor in New York, whose characters are understood to be complex but personable with distinguished intuitiveness and acumen, and immaculate rationality. They don’t connive to violations of law nor do they truckle to threats. In this 1 hour featured show, it doesn’t always result in solving 1 or more crimes within the period. At times, it gets personal putting the lives of CSIs themselves into jeopardy.
The CSI characters each are developed in an unique and exquisite manner with each having their own issues, dark periods, test of endurance, flash backs etc… The show uses state of the art technology in addition to intricate attention to details, in particular, it has a keen inclination towards microscopic particles, fibres and glasses. It deals with numerous fields covering almost all aspects of science and arts which begs the question regarding the voluminous and universal knowledge the CSI team possesses. The show also uses a lot of technical expressions (a result from an analysis or experiment) which remains gobbledygook to one with limited or no knowledge in that field. One thing, if I understood from this show is that, a dead body speaks more than the one alive!
From the multitude of episodes, you will be caught no matter how intelligently you plan the crime. Why? Because you have no freaking clue of how many things are unique!! There is no perfect crime!
But at times, clues in context to technology related to electronics/computers which is my area of expertise relatively in opposition to say, biology, I find them ridiculous and funny (not always). For exam
ple, in CSI – New York, Season 03, Episode 02, a man is found dead in a jewelry store which is robbed by 3 women clad in same outfit and hard to distinguish between. On analyzing the crime scene (where all the glasses are broken and jewels are looted), they come to know that, the broken glasses doesn’t have any stress marks indicating directionality (when you strike a glass, the broken glass shows a pattern denoting the direction of impact). From a witness in the crime scene who claimed that a dog barked just before the glass shattered, they discover that they used a “frequency device”. Now comes the funny part.
CSI(1): how could one do that?
CSI(2) A sine wave generator. It is a program that manipulates sound. You download the output to a mp3 player and you are ready.
CSI(1): ahan! Check all web sites. Anyone who deals with this kind of software. Cross check with the name “Beth”.CSI(2): (after some other scenes) The name you gave was good. A women by the name of Beth Lawson bought a sine wave generator program last month from an online distributor. It turns out there was no forwarding address in the package she ordered. The delivery man explained her as “one hot blondie” and she studies “physics” in college.
CSI(1): Beth was studying physics, Natalie was studying engineering…?!!
CSI(2): yes, both indulging in homicide!
I know! People from engineering background, I need not even explain this. You are already ROTFL. The concept is very true, using high frequency vibration, you could break a glass. But, for a student studying in engineering and physics, writing their own code of a sine wave “program” will take less than 10 seconds rather than placing an online order!! OMG! cracking the case with an online order for a sine wave program purchased by engineering students… it must be a real dull college.
There may be some similar technicalities in other fields too. Otherwise, the show is wondrous, one of a kind. Awe striking graphics & animation, good continuity, the reality in posing the dead bodies, the action, car chases, bomb blasts, internal story line, very little provocative content, character development, technology etc… are inexplicable. Also the details they analyze including finger prints, DNA, blood spatter, fibre particles, glass particles, even sand, paints, acids and drug tests, bugs, weapons including guns for their mm calibers and other instruments resulting in death by stabbing. Anything and everything on the Earth is analyzed!!
Its therefore impossible to escape… BEWARE!
A) BBC HORIZON DOCUMENTARY & B) INDIA: BIRD FLU January 17, 2008
Posted by arun in TV shows, happenings, thoughts.Tags: BBC Horizon, bird flu, brutal killing, catastrophe, chickens, documentary, epidemic, killing, perfect method, prevention, respect, techniques
8 comments
Aired January 15th, the documentary from BBC Horizon, “How to kill a human being?” narrated by Michael Portillo. The narration was ingenuous, sincere, legitimate and simple in its purview. With the amount of scientific innovations coming up every year, it definitely surprises one to find these vicious techniques still practiced as methods of execution. It would be unjust of me to write any further, as it would turn out to be a spoiler for the interested people and would also be demoralizing the efforts of the Horizon team. All I can say is, the documentary pellucidly portrays the amount of humaneness if any in the existing techniques in the process of killing a human being subjected to death punishment by trial and tries to find if there is a better way to perform it. A very good and a must see documentary!
Coming to the second topic in my title, the Bird Flu incident in India. Now, the iGoogle page certainly helps in keeping up to date with the current events with the aid of uber-cool gadgets. However, the more I see the more it makes me dull. I am already morose after being infected with dry cough for the past 2 days, a gift fulfilled on account of my excessive ranting over the fact that I pay for medical insurance and have not visited the doctor even once (for more than a year). The number of unpleasant incidents only grow in profuse, saturating your brain. I swigged my lukewarm tea as I clicked here and read about the Bird flu incident. Without digressing any further, quoting,
“Our objective is to cull up to 400,000 chickens and contain the virus from spreading at any cost.”
More than 300 veterinary workers and volunteers killed the birds by breaking their necks and in some cases stuffing them in gunny sacks and burying them alive. Eggs were also destroyed.
I totally understand the pandemic this has and will cause and its deleterious effects. However, is it really necessary to kill passel of those birds in this heinous manner? Anyone among us can avow this is definitely not the humane way to deal with. Catastrophes always catches us off-guard and these are sporadic events and will occur incessantly if not now, at a later point of time, if not this, some other incident, until every measure is taken to curb it completely. It is certainly an arduous task. If one were to blame time as an issue for retorting in this unfathomable manner, killing those birds brutally, it only exhibits the faltering safety measures. My purpose of adding the information regarding this documentary is to connote the adequate and inexpensive methodologies available and is even practiced for killing farm animals in a painless manner. How difficult would it be to be prepared by anticipating such disasters? Is it always necessary for some animal rights (in this case) or human rights commision (in some other cases) to goad the authorities concerned? Why follow these obstinate advocacies? Is this so imperceptible? I have no clue.
We genuflect in front of cows claiming it as a form of God. We have almost every animal and bird associated with a God. The least we can do is restrict our lethargic attitude and impudent behavior and if we have to kill them, then do it by inflicting minimum amount of pain. Scathing them and burying them alive is immoral!