I AM LEGEND: A DISAPPOINTMENT January 21, 2008
Posted by arun in entertainment, movies.Tags: action, bad, boring, comedy, dog, English, horror, i am legend, movie, non-entertaining, sci-fi, thriller, will smith, zombies
18 comments
SPOILER ALERT:
How to waste 90 minutes? Watch this movie.
Movie: I am Legend
Starring: Will Smith and a German Shepherd.
Genre: Drama / Horror / Sci-Fi / Thriller
My Rating: 3.0/10
I have always liked Will Smith movies. But, it sure is totally adventitious for this movie to have a 7.3/10 in IMDB. Unbelievable.
People who loved this movie, I am sorry to disappoint you. The way I see it, this movie is a total waste of time. The plot outline from IMDB is,
It is the year 2012. In the ruins of New York city. Robert Neville who is a military scientist who is the lone survivor of a biochemical disease which was supposed to cure cancer 3 years previous. With only blood thirsty zombies as his neighbors and his trusty dog, Samantha, Robert is trying to discover a cure for this disease and to find out any other people who might have also survived.
The movie starts with a lady scientist being interviewed who claims to have found cure for cancer which then turns into a disaster spreading a virus which devolves almost every being into fearsome overzealous zombielikes. They are for some reason reluctant or unendurable to sunlight. Therefore implying they are a threat only after sunset. Will Smith is one of the very few who is immune to the virus, though the only survivor in New York. One fine morning, he goes deer hunting in the city of New York, yes, on the streets. While targeting a deer which is almost cornered, a Lioness pounces on it while the whole of the Lion family (including cubs) are on their way to feast it. He carries a gun, but backs off magnanimously saving his gallantry for Zombies. His German Shepherd dog is with him all this time. An alarm in his watch goes off, a signal to return home owing to sunset. On the way to his house after the futile hunt, he decants some liquid in front of his house, which I can only guess is not water, probably to keep the zombies away from detecting some smell?
He was a Lieutenant colonel military scientist assigned to this particular base – ground zero. Obviously, he goes to his research laboratory in his basement, where he checks and records his current results on his animal experiments with different strains. He finds that, one particular strain has begun to reverse and wither the zombie effects thereby destroying the virus, somehow. He is ready to test on humans. Every night, he closes his special blinders which completely seals the house. This you can see through out the movie, every night when he is about to sleep. Also, we see a glimpse of his past as his nightmares, before the pandemic occurred. He has lost his child and wife over it. And till now, Will Smith converses only to his dog. Fortunately, the dog doesn’t speak back. Further emphasis on his loneliness over the past 3-4 years happens when he goes to a deserted DVD shop where he initiates conversation to the cut-outs and lifeless human models laid for advertising in the shop. Every day afternoon, he sits in a particular place transmitting a message on AM radio seeking out to help people and that they are not alone. 50% of the movie is over, where the monologue is mostly with his schipperke.
I couldn’t bear it anymore. But just then comes the much awaited pivotal scene, he sets trap for a zombie, it is successful. However, another zombie, the alpha male of its kind, seeing it roars rambunctiously expressing his discontent. He could not come out of the dark building because of sunlight. On his next day-trip, “Fred” one of the lifeless shop model character has been replaced somehow from his usual position which is in front of the DVD shop to somewhere else. Will Smith asks him, “How did you end up here?”. He goes near Fred to fall in to a similar trap as constructed by him to capture the zombie earlier. Now, while trying out his strain on the captured zombie earlier, he claims that they are now totally inhuman and that they lack the human instincts because of lesser brain functioning ridiculing them as pseudo-intelligent species. I don’t understand how the zombie reconstructed the trap. Will Smith falls for it. Who the hell is intelligent??? One thing is for sure… I aint!! to continue watching this movie.
He manages to escape from the zombie’s vicious attack, however his dog is attacked, wounded and infected. The dog starts to exhibit the same wild zombielike characteristics. He is forced to kill by strangling it. I don’t know why he couldn’t advocate his researched strain which yielded better results on animals. With extreme anguish and frustration, he decides to kill as many zombies as possible by baiting himself in the dark. Just when he is about to be killed, a flash of light shines upon and he is rescued. His damn radio has been finally put to some use. He is rescued by Anna, another survivor with immunity. However, he is followed on his way home by the zombies. Again they seem intelligent and powerful to me!! Rest is climax where the movie ensues with some typical fight sequences.
I don’t even want to discuss the climax for the philosophical crap the movie portrayed. I am glad if I could help a few to not fall for this pretence enthrallment. I am happy I could write my views without lambasting about this utter piece of shit. Why canines are impervious to airborne virus attack alone? What the hell was he doing in his laboratory? There was no scientific content that engages a meaningful or convincing sequence over his discoveries or experiments. Why sunlight is harmful to the zombies? I only remember a 1001 days of research. Now, even if I accept his quest for finding a cure amidst his otherwise pathetic and lonely life for over 3 years to be admirable, speaking with a dog and a bunch of shop banners almost the entire movie makes it worse.
I can only assume that the intension was to bring out the essence of self-destruction and the aftermath of isolation and paranoia. The only best thing that combats the googolplex of loop holes in the plot was Will Smith’s acting. It was an inexplicable performance, be it delivering his agony over losing his dog with whom he had been speaking over for 3 years (50% of the movie too) or when he is incensed at Anna, when she tells him that she coming here was for a reason. He upbraids her over her meaningless consolations that God has spoken to her and reneges on her offer to join to some other safe place. However, in toto, a depraved and a callow movie, with sci-fi being the weasel word.
A) BBC HORIZON DOCUMENTARY & B) INDIA: BIRD FLU January 17, 2008
Posted by arun in TV shows, happenings, thoughts.Tags: BBC Horizon, bird flu, brutal killing, catastrophe, chickens, documentary, epidemic, killing, perfect method, prevention, respect, techniques
8 comments
Aired January 15th, the documentary from BBC Horizon, “How to kill a human being?” narrated by Michael Portillo. The narration was ingenuous, sincere, legitimate and simple in its purview. With the amount of scientific innovations coming up every year, it definitely surprises one to find these vicious techniques still practiced as methods of execution. It would be unjust of me to write any further, as it would turn out to be a spoiler for the interested people and would also be demoralizing the efforts of the Horizon team. All I can say is, the documentary pellucidly portrays the amount of humaneness if any in the existing techniques in the process of killing a human being subjected to death punishment by trial and tries to find if there is a better way to perform it. A very good and a must see documentary!
Coming to the second topic in my title, the Bird Flu incident in India. Now, the iGoogle page certainly helps in keeping up to date with the current events with the aid of uber-cool gadgets. However, the more I see the more it makes me dull. I am already morose after being infected with dry cough for the past 2 days, a gift fulfilled on account of my excessive ranting over the fact that I pay for medical insurance and have not visited the doctor even once (for more than a year). The number of unpleasant incidents only grow in profuse, saturating your brain. I swigged my lukewarm tea as I clicked here and read about the Bird flu incident. Without digressing any further, quoting,
“Our objective is to cull up to 400,000 chickens and contain the virus from spreading at any cost.”
More than 300 veterinary workers and volunteers killed the birds by breaking their necks and in some cases stuffing them in gunny sacks and burying them alive. Eggs were also destroyed.
I totally understand the pandemic this has and will cause and its deleterious effects. However, is it really necessary to kill passel of those birds in this heinous manner? Anyone among us can avow this is definitely not the humane way to deal with. Catastrophes always catches us off-guard and these are sporadic events and will occur incessantly if not now, at a later point of time, if not this, some other incident, until every measure is taken to curb it completely. It is certainly an arduous task. If one were to blame time as an issue for retorting in this unfathomable manner, killing those birds brutally, it only exhibits the faltering safety measures. My purpose of adding the information regarding this documentary is to connote the adequate and inexpensive methodologies available and is even practiced for killing farm animals in a painless manner. How difficult would it be to be prepared by anticipating such disasters? Is it always necessary for some animal rights (in this case) or human rights commision (in some other cases) to goad the authorities concerned? Why follow these obstinate advocacies? Is this so imperceptible? I have no clue.
We genuflect in front of cows claiming it as a form of God. We have almost every animal and bird associated with a God. The least we can do is restrict our lethargic attitude and impudent behavior and if we have to kill them, then do it by inflicting minimum amount of pain. Scathing them and burying them alive is immoral!
FUNNY: IMPLIED MEANINGS January 14, 2008
Posted by arun in entertainment, humor, life, thoughts.Tags: crap, fun, implied meaning, joke, orkut, thoughts
7 comments
Just for fun. People try to be modest. Sometimes, it comes by not uttering genuine thoughts. And at times, because of formality… Here I have written a few of them I could pull off. Hope its enjoyable.
Comment: You are photogenic.
Implied: You look at least ok in the photo.
Comment: Hmm… you are not photogenic.
Implied: Holy crap! You look even worse in the photo.
Comment: When you find time, check out my blog at http://arunkumarsrinivasan.wordpress.com
Implied: Be a baby, leave your work as it is and check my post IMMEDIATELY.
Comment: Leave your comments, if any. (related to blog)
Implied: write a comment DEFINITELY. PRAISE ME.
Comment: In the comment section (by someone whom you don’t know yet), “Good one!!”.
Implied: I am advertising. I read nothing in your blog. But mine is good. READ it.
Comment: In Orkut, under about me, “PS: if you don’t know me, please don’t add me as friend or scrap me. I am not here to make new friends”.
Implied: I am no good for you. You SHOULD scrap or add me as friend. Then, I will reject it. I already stated the reason. Also, I like to tickle my schadenfraude.
Comment: In Orkut, over change of photo, “good snap!!”
Implied: Hoping, you will comment mine the same way.
Comment: I am glad things are working out for you.
Implied: Don’t bug me. Leave me alone.
Comment: You are really good in physics!!
Implied: Tell me I am good in chemistry and math. And in physics too!!
Comment: Hey how are you? its been a long time we chatted!!
Implied: I am bored and you are available. For the heck of it, reply.
Comment: In messenger (msn, gtalk or yahoo etc…), Status: Busy (or) do not disturb. Message: “Are you there?” (or) “Are you busy?”
Implied: Who gives a f*ck about the status. Reply, damn it.
Comment: By a smoker, “Don’t smoke. Its very bad.”
Implied: You think I care about you. No, I like to behave matured. This is what everyone say. So do I now.
Person1: Hi, what are you doing? (over chat)
Person2: Hiii, I am reading the article titled “Do we sleep in dream or dream in sleep?”, a novel research, from the December 2007 edition of “Scientific philosophical astronomo Crap” magazine. Its awesome!
Person1 (thinks): OMG, I woke up the lion at the wrong time. I am dead.
Person2 (thinks): I don’t understand a shit in it. However, I will make sure that I brag about this article word by word to him till he is dead meat or I am bored.
Comment: I need some help with Matlab. You are good at it…
Implied: (Most of the times) Can you finish the work for me?
Comment: Wassup?
Implied: I don’t have a clue why or what I wanted to type or ask.
Comment: I am too shy.
Implied: Don’t expect me to make the first move.
Comment: I don’t intend to harm, vilify, hurt or point anyone in any form by means of this post. Its just for fun.
Implied: Come on you know
![]()
Yes, I love these blockquotes!!
ENGLISH LANGUAGE, I ADMIRE January 13, 2008
Posted by arun in humor, life, personal, thoughts.Tags: convey, English, expression, father, happiness, interests, language, motivation, satisfaction, thesaurus, thoughts, vocabulary
7 comments
I am not a voracious blogger unlike my other very good friend Perumal. You can see his 4 blog links on my Blogroll! In spite of his capricious delete-join spree associated with Orkut
, he has been actively and elegantly blogging for quite a long time now. How he finds time to write amidst his schedule is a wonder. But, it instills in me the quality of perseverance to continue to blog for the reasons I actually started this in the first place. I say this because, usually, I start to blog with all the will power one can have and then quickly it vaporizes into thin air. Not this time! I have always had a particular jones to English language and have always been trying to learn new words to express my thoughts with better clarity. It gives me a greater sense of satisfaction. Blogging serves every purpose, including the compromise for the evil “laziness” (which is of course good). Some connoted that my writing or narration is good in addition to my vocabulary. Thank you! And I certainly don’t deny that I sometimes make the wrong usage for a particular word I learnt. Correct me if you find any.
I get reminded of a particular incident I would like to share. I was taking part in an English oratorical competition back in 1996/97. The topic was something related to my country India and its patriotic leaders who struggled for independence. I sought the help of my father, a major in Physics, whom I admire for his extraordinary oratorical skills and his command of English language in spite of studying in a pure Tamil medium. So, I approached him and asked to write 2 pages of worthy content with magniloquent English that would fetch me a first prize. He insisted on me writing the 2 pages as a rough draft and bringing it back to him and that he would paraphrase it. Of course it was the right approach, but back then, I was pissed off. I insinuated in him that I knew zilch about the leaders and the struggle, I was in my 7th grade. Then, he complied on writing the “script” if I sat along with him. After numerous editing and proper juxtaposing of the content for proper continuity, WE finished it
. He asked me to memorize it and then perform in front of him with adequate gesticulation (which shows the involvement), before the competition. He has always asked me to read newspapers, for it helps in keeping up with the current events and also learning English. Come on, who reads it at age 12?? He has bragged a gazillion times about how he used to read the newspaper and referred the dictionary for improving his English
. I remember vividly, while writing, he told me how beautiful it would be to express one’s thoughts with clarity, with command over language, and also the importance of vocabulary. He is certainly no Shakespeare. But, I was impressed with the way he explained it. He asked me, how would you say this in English?
I have to write this in Tamil.
“rendu thoguthiku naduvila vizhaivukal puriyama kazhlpunarchi (virodham) naala sandai”. Roughly translated means, There is a fight because of enmity between two societies without awareness of the aftereffects.
Certainly, it was not difficult to translate. I was preening after I translated it with a minimum effort (worse than the rough translation above). He replied,
or you can say it like this. “Exasperated by vituperation, our antagonists have inaugurated hostility in our locality unintimidated vaticination of catastrophe.”
When I heard it back then, it certainly left me awestruck. I started laughing boisterously and was filled with delight. I badly wanted to know more words. I asked him to write it down for me. I memorized that even before starting with the script to boast to my friends at school. It worked
. With maturity over years, more than preening, the purpose let me learn better.
The End
.
CRICKET: THE ALLEGED RACIAL ABUSE – AN OUTLOOK January 9, 2008
Posted by arun in cricket, entertainment, humor, sports, thoughts.Tags: alleged, australia, BCCI, Bucknor, cricket, dickheads, false racial abuse, ICC, inconclusive, india, old, passion, sports, umpire
8 comments
I am not an ardent admirer or a fervid fan of Cricket as I once was. However, the vehement incidents that happened over the last test match resulting in alleging and vilifying Harbhajan over racial abuse certainly gets every Indian’s attention and I am no different. I have tried to put forth my views, claims, comments as understandable as it needs to be. Yes, it is as simple as that.
First things first.
Question: Does Steve Bucknor really have a peculiar tryst with the Indian team or is he really impotent?
Answer: Both.
What is this hothead doing at 61 years umpiring when the time taken by his eyes for a simple gaze is 10 seconds minimum, the reaction time for a LBW being less than a second. Owls see better at day and snakes hear better than him. Vampires can better perform in the day than this loony screwball. Even an astronomical pince-nez buckled up his non-gazing eyes couldn’t save the spirit of cricket from this old bloke, whose fingers gets aroused when the bowler’s appeal rings in his ears (120 tests and still STANDING). Probably he should have heeded to the then umpire Dickie Bird and retired with unblemished record while he could, who had to say,
When you get to that age… I have said to Steve, ‘Don’t go on too long, get out while you are still respected
Well, Mr. Bird, that ain’t going to happen any sooner, at least not without clouting. Is it Mr. Bucknor?
Secondly, coming to the alleged racial abuse. So, lets see what Andrew Symonds had to say.
This is what happened before our confrontation. Brett Lee had just sent down a delivery and Harbhajan took off down the wicket. When he was returning to his crease, he decided to hit Brett on the backside. I have no idea why he did it. I was standing nearby and when I saw what happened, I thought, ‘Hold on, that’s not on’. I’m a firm believer in sticking up for your team-mate so I stepped in and had a bit of a crack at Harbhajan, telling him exactly what I thought of his antics. He then had a shot back, which brings us to the situation we’re facing.
This seems not an obvious taradiddle, certainly. One has to accept. However, who could assure about the credibility of the “shot back” he has mentioned. There was this deaf and blind Bucknor. Adam Gilchrist said he dint hear anything. Ricky Ponting also dint hear anything but lodged the complaint frantically over the statement of Symonds I guess. Who are the cry-babies now?? Other than that, the only player in the vicinity was Sachin excluding the alleged Harbhajan.
The match referee Mike Procter harangued,
Obviously this has all been very difficult for me. I didn’t get to sleep until 11am, and then only for a couple of hours. It has been one of the most difficult days of my life.
Hell yeah! If you couldn’t sleep, take your pills and calm down. I hope not the brains seize functioning due to lack of sleep. After innumerous incorrigible umpiring decisions and a ban over an alleged, inconclusive, biased and concocted judgement, if you expect the Indian board to be callous, then you probably should question yourself “Am I fit for this position?”. Isn’t it obvious, when there is not enough evidence, the benefit of doubt goes to the alleged.
Next, this is really interesting. Steve Waugh and Allan border had said that the whole issue is a consequence of cultural misunderstanding. Boy, why dint we think of that?? When Glenn McGrath asked Sarwan, “What does Brian Lara’s d*** taste like”, Sarwan misunderstood it because of “cultural misunderstanding”. And when Sarwan owing to the “cultural misunderstanding” backfired with the reply “Ask your wife”, again unfortunately, this time McGrath misunderstood and yelled at Sarwan “If you f***ing mention my wife again, I will f***ing rip your f***ing throat off”. Check out this video below.
Pakistan wicket keeper Rashid Latif was banned for 5 ODI over a disputed catch against Bangladesh. How is it different when Michael Clarke replicated the similar scenario? And which crackpot umpire asks the players to arrive at the decision? That too, Ricky Ponting!! We all know how much of a gentleman he is. Boy, he couldn’t tolerate his streak record against Harbhajan, out in the first ball in 5 times.
Praise Ponting, don’t bury him, says Malcolm Conn.
I say “Bugger off”. Let clear of alcohol in your system and then speak without rumbling and rambling (unlike my blog). And, don’t even get me started over Dravid’s appeal!!
Sachin’s stern belief over Harbhajan and opinion over the bias at the hearing on repudiating their views entirely has lead to the BCCI restoring the pride of India by retaliating to the excruciating injustice. BCCI has placed their views with cogent reasoning, proving their standpoint, by not yielding to the false accusations blindfoldedly. They have also announced that Indian team will continue the game in Perth with decisions regarding Harbhajan’s ban postponed for later. Lets see how far this has yet to go.
WINTER AND SODIUM ACETATE – KITH AND KIN: HAND WARMERS January 8, 2008
Posted by arun in chemistry, science, technology.Tags: chemistry, clothing, global warming, hand warmers, heat device, jackets, nucleation, science, sodium acetate, supercooling, sweaters, technology, winter
1 comment so far
Global warming has certainly become a much debatable topic, though the debate itself is what has partially led to the awareness in spite of its uncertainty. The inconclusiveness also has resulted in innumerous (constructive?) antagonism amongst various researchers, each of who possess a charismatic charm in convincing us with their theories corroborated with evidence and more than enough evidence to denigrate others’ results that they confabulated or concocted those. The denouement of this long perpetuating argument should be arrived sooner or later.
The number of seasons a region or country experiences is seemingly declining in the Southern India. A few years back, I could say we had at least 3 seasons; summer, very brief winter and rainy. But the situation now seems to give the impression that at least Chennai has only summer season throughout the year having become impotent of the other seasons, a blunt non-statistical inference though. However, in Germany, its already around -4 to -12 degree Celsius and counting. What is the funny but rather irritating consequence (I am not discussing Global warming)? It takes about 10 minutes to gear up with every piece of clothing you have, including thermal wears, t-shirt, another t-shirt, a sweater, jean, ear-bands or khullahs, neck-scarf(??) , gloves and finally a jacket minimum. This is similar to that of funny olden day Tamil Heroes getting loaded with shiny leather jackets, armors, hand grenades, machine guns bla bla… near the climax of the movie to slay the Villain and free the heroine after which they live happily ever after (Even Arnold Schwarzenegger movies!!). And what is even more irritating is, due to the presence of heaters inside the building (which is indispensable) some of the clothes have to be taken off to stop sweating.
Also sometimes the gloves aren’t that protective and you still require more warmth. It was not long before I came across this simple but intriguing heat device. It was some sort of a liquid along with what seemed like a switch. On pressing the switch, the liquid undergoes an immediate transition to solid phase and in the process generates heat, an exothermic reaction. My ignorance lead to a sense of bafflement over such a sophisticated and ingenious method of generating heat. How? This is where Sodium acetate, CH3COO-Na+ comes into picture. I quote from Wikipedia rather than trying to rephrase it. Awesome!
Sodium acetate is also used in consumer heating pads or hand warmers and is also used in “hot ice”. When sodium acetate trihydrate crystals (melting point 58 °C) are heated to around 100 °C, they melt. When this melt cools, it gives a supersaturated solution of sodium acetate in water. This solution is capable of supercooling to room temperature, well below its melting point, without forming crystals. By clicking on a metal disc in the heating pad, a nucleation center is formed which causes the solution to crystallize into solid sodium acetate trihydrate again. The bond-forming process of crystallization is exothermic, hence heat is emitted. The latent heat of fusion is about 264–289 kJ/kg (Source).
Also, I came across this video which should give a better understanding. (Courtesy and credits)
